Tucker Carlson Explains Why Illegal Children Need To Be Deported

Libturds are completely out of touch and not effected by these policies in their elite ivory towers. That's why they continue to support these failed policies.

Nightmare On Social Justice Warrior Street

UK Votes To Stay British Not European Slaves

Prime Minister David Cameron is to step down by October after the UK voted to leave the European Union.

Mr Cameron made the announcement in a statement outside Downing Street after the final result was announced.

He said he would attempt to "steady the ship" over the coming weeks and months but that "fresh leadership" was needed.

The PM had urged the country to vote Remain, warning of economic and security consequences of an exit, but the UK voted to Leave by 52% to 48%.

Full Story at BBC

Yes Virginia There are No Go Zones In London

Muslims chase police out of no go zone in Peckham.

Merkel Refugee Love and European Hate Costs Her Party Elections

Merkel fights back tears announcing election results

Anti-Angela Merkel protestors have taken to the streets to vent their anger at the German minster they blame for adding further chaos to the migrant crisis.

The anger comes as many of the population head to polls today, in what is expected to deliver a crushing blow to the leader's party.

Early exit polls indicate not only was there a rise in the number of German's taking to the ballot box, support for her party has plummeted.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives lost in two out of three state elections as Germans punished her accommodative refugee policy with a big vote for the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD), exit polls showed.

The losses in both Baden-Wuerttemberg and Rhineland Palatinate represented a worst-case scenario for Merkel, who has staked her legacy on her decision last year to open Germany's doors to over 1 million migrants - a move voters snubbed.

The backlash was also visible in Saxony-Anhalt in former East Germany, where Merkel's conservative Christian Democrats (CDU) remained the largest party but saw the AfD grab 21.5 percent of the vote as it burst into all three regional parliaments.

Merkel has faced fierce criticism since calling for refugees to head for Germany where she said they would be welcomed.

Over a million migrants have since arrived in the country.

Demonstrators who took to the streets of Germany’s capital on Saturday chanted "Merkel must go" and "We are the people" as they paraded with German flags.

The group of 2,000 were accompanied Saturday by a heavy police escort in a bid to keep them away from a nearby smaller counter-protest.

German Chancellor Merkel is accused of adding fuel to the migrant crisis with after she insisted her country would “manage” the migrants who entered.

However after registering 1.2m asylum seekers in 2015 alone the country appeared to perform a u-turn.

The mass movements of migrants across the EU bloc from war torn countries including Syria, and some from Africa, has all but broken the Schengen agreement as struggling countries erect temporary blocks at their borders.

The rallies took place near the Berlin central station.

Armed police squads are on duty at the station, on platforms and exits.

Merkel Policies Push Germany Further Right

Frauke Petry

From The New York Times

In the current tussle for the future of Germany, Frauke Petry is what you might call the anti-Angela Merkel.

Where Ms. Merkel, the chancellor, has welcomed refugees, Ms. Petry, a rising far-right leader, has said border guards might need to turn guns on anyone crossing a frontier illegally.

Where Ms. Merkel has urged tolerance, Ms. Petry has embraced the angry populism now running through Europe and the United States.

“The preachers of hatred” was how the news weekly Der Spiegel characterized the new German right on its cover last month, emblazoned with a portrait of the petite Ms. Petry.

But this brisk, garrulous 40-year-old is more than Ms. Merkel’s foil. She is a disruptive, new force on the German political scene.

She and her party, the Alternative for Germany, have ridden a wave of discontent over the chancellor’s embrace of more than one million refugees to their strongest poll ratings ever.

They are now roiling Germany’s placid, consensus-driven politics and threatening to alter its political landscape as insurgent parties have done in less stable or prosperous countries around Europe.

Not unlike Donald J. Trump in the United States, she is also breaking open a political dialogue and liberating a new and impolitic — critics say racist — language in the mainstream.

“The power of the established parties is crumbling,” a jubilant Ms. Petry told supporters after her party took 13.2 percent of the vote in normally sleepy local elections in the central state of Hesse last Sunday.

This Sunday is another test, with elections in three larger and more important states — one in the east and two in the west — that are being closely watched as a referendum on the chancellor’s refugee policies and a bellwether for the nation.

In the east, support for the Alternative for Germany now nears 20 percent — about double that in the west.

But even in the west, the far-right rebellion is chipping away at the chancellor’s conservative Christian Democrats, as well as its Social Democratic coalition partners, in a country where the Nazi past looms large.

The Alternative for Germany party has already elbowed its way into five state Parliaments, and is predicted to sail into three more with up to one-fifth of the vote on Sunday.

Ms. Merkel’s push this week for European Union leaders to hammer out a deal with Turkey to stem the refugee flow was intended in no small part to beat back the challenge Ms. Petry represents.

There is no doubt that the migrant crisis changed the fortunes of Ms. Petry’s party.

Initially founded in 2013 as a protest against the euro, the Alternative for Germany shifted emphasis to protecting German identity as hundreds of thousands of migrants entered the country last year.

Ms. Petry and other nationalist-minded leaders ousted the more Europe-oriented founder of the party, then locked onto the identity issue as the embodiment of how Ms. Merkel and the German establishment were ruining the country and ignoring ordinary folk, said Hajo Funke, a politics professor at the Free University in Berlin.

Starting in the former Communist East Germany, in Ms. Petry’s home state of Saxony, they whipped “unhappiness about political and economic alienation” into anger and double-digit scores in opinion polls, Professor Funke said.

Ms. Petry has stood out, he added. “She wants power, she wants to get into government.”

Professor Funke and other leading political scientists are doubtful her success will last. But the immediate impact of the migrant crisis is undeniable, cutting across age, education, class, region and political persuasion.

Street protests rapidly descend into right-wing chants of “Merkel must go!” and left-wing cries of “Out with Nazis!” Violent attacks on asylum seekers and their housing have increased.

Now, the elections in three of Germany’s 16 states on Sunday will be the first significant voter test of both Ms. Merkel’s policy and Ms. Petry’s rapid ascent.

Both women are from former East Germany, both hold doctorates in science and both have connections to the Lutheran church — Ms. Merkel’s father was a Lutheran pastor, as is Ms. Petry’s estranged husband.

The similarities end there.

Unlike the 61-year-old chancellor, Ms. Petry sees 1990 as “a missed opportunity to really reunite.”

“Much that was successful in the East was simply swallowed by the West,” she said in an interview. In the next 25 years, she argued, a view of Germany evolved that demeaned the country, with policies against families, against nuclear power and against German traditions.

In this atmosphere, “it is not surprising that a party which argues for a self-conscious nation-state in a Europe of Fatherlands is seen as reactionary,” she said.

“That only shows how one-sided the discussion in Germany has been for years,” said Ms. Petry, a mother of four.

As for the Nazi past, she said, “the uniqueness, the singularity of German guilt has stood much too often in the forefront, and distorted the view that there are also enough positive aspects to our history.”

In a shabby hall on the outskirts of Mannheim, a city of 300,000 about 60 miles south of Frankfurt, Ms. Petry got a sympathetic hearing from some 250 listeners.

“Germany is crazy,” said Katja Kornmacher, 46, who said she works in a publishing house and holds two university degrees. “We have the feeling that we can’t say anything” against the leftist view in Germany. “It starts in school, where we are told what is correct.”

“And those who follow this line land better in life,” she continued. “The line is: ‘Right is bad, left is good.’ And then the leftists are outside shouting against this democratic event.”

Ms. Kornmacher was referring to perhaps 30 leftists who jeered those who came to hear Ms. Petry. More than 200 police officers were on duty to ensure there were no clashes.

Emotions are high since the local newspaper, the Mannheimer Morgen, ran a now-infamous interview with Ms. Petry in which she contemplated border guards using guns to keep out refugees.

Ms. Petry says her words were twisted by what she calls the “Pinocchio press” to say that she favored an order to shoot, similar to that in East Germany.

The political establishment in Germany has mostly dealt with Ms. Petry and her party by refusing to appear with them in public, and ruling out any coalition government with them.

Hotels and other institutions have even declined to rent halls to the party.

In Merseburg, a picturesque town of 36,000 in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, which votes on Sunday, the Christian Democrat mayor, Jens Bühligen, 49, has managed to accommodate about 2,800 refugees, mostly spread through the town in empty apartments.

He said he has defused protests by going to them, and listening. “It works,” he said.

But some of Sunday’s prospective voters had a different view. When about 150 people rallied for the Alternative for Germany, the anger of a cluster of women, all 60 or older, was palpable.

“We were not asked!” about the refugees, they yelled.

A burly 63-year-old woman in a red anorak, who like the others declined to give her name, said she had worked for 42 years and gets 621 euros a month, about $685, from her pension.

Watching how the refugees are treated, she said, “I have never had so much hatred inside me.”

61% Of Americans Oppose Immigration

Sixty-one percent of Americans agree that "continued immigration into the country jeopardizes the United States," according to a new poll commissioned by management consulting firm A.T. Kearney that revealed pessimism across a wide range of issues.

The degree of concern is remarkable considering that the question was about all immigration, including the legal kind. Even Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said he supports legal immigration into the U.S.

A.T. Kearney gave Bloomberg Businessweek an exclusive first look at the results of the survey, which covers 2,590 respondents and is part of an America@250 study that's intended to gauge the nation's direction with 10 years to go before its 250th birthday. The study, which will be posted online later this month, was conducted last October and November by NPD Group.

The political climate may help account for Americans' immigration fears, says Paul Laudicina, chairman of the Global Business Policy Council, which is a unit of A.T. Kearney. "Given what's going on in the national discourse and the desperate state of national politics ... it makes people vulnerable to jingoistic sloganeering," he said in an interview.

A belief that immigration jeopardizes the U.S. was common across age groups, although highest among baby boomers (65 percent) and lowest among millennials (55 percent). By education, it was highest among those with just a high school education or some college (65 percent), and by region it was highest in the South, including Texas (66 percent).

There were lots of other sour findings in the survey. Fifty-eight percent of respondents agreed with the statement "I’m not confident in the U.S. economy’s ability to return to stronger growth." Fifty-two percent agreed, "U.S. businesses will be increasingly uncompetitive." And 51 percent agreed, "My vote doesn’t matter because politics in Washington will never change."

On the plus side, 85 percent of respondents agreed, "Technological progress in a range of sectors will boost U.S. productivity and economic growth."

"American public opinion is very much in a state of flux," says Laudicina. "You can make a case that people are more reasonable and more optimistic than you would be willing to guess based on the nature of the political dialogue."

The A.T. Kearney survey seems to show more negativity toward immigration than other recent surveys, although it's hard to tell because each one uses its own question wording. A Pew Research Center study conducted in August through October found that 53 percent of respondents thought immigration strengthened the U.S. vs. 38 percent who thought it burdened the U.S. In a Gallup Poll in June, 34 percent of respondents favored a decrease in immigration, 25 percent favored an increase, and 40 percent favored keeping it at current levels.

What is clear is that Americans are more down on immigration than in past eras. As recently as 2002, the Harris Poll found that only 1 percent of Americans mentioned immigration, including refugees, when asked to name the two most important issues for the government to address. That rose to 19 percent last year.

Facebook Founder, Mark Zuckerberg, Admits To Being Zionist Fascist

Billionaire, alleged tax-dodger, CEO and all-round PC dullard Mark Zuckerberg has said Facebook is not doing enough to combat hate speech.  Also showing he is manipulated by the Zionist media to help implode free Euro-US societies under Zionist-Fascist control.  

Typical, his pro Zionist tirades are infamous according to current and former Facebook executives.  Recall the 2012-2014 Facebook policy of deleting accounts of folk who dared question Israel's genocide against Palestinians.

At a recent townhall event in Berlin he pledged to work closer with the German authorities, and even offered to fund a section of the German police, in order to help Facebook expand its view of ‘protected groups’ and restrict ‘hate speech against migrants’.

Pardon my German, but what utter scheisse.

What Zuckerberg seems to be missing is that Facebook is supposed to be about enabling the free interaction of people – all this talk of ‘protected groups’ and ‘hate speech’ should be anathema to him. But Zuckerberg subscribes to the typical metropolitan, Silicon-Valley-via-Ivy-League brand of faux-liberalism, which actually has a lot in common with the fascism he claims to despise.

‘Hate speech has no place on Facebook or in our community’, he said. ‘Until recently in Germany I don’t think we were doing a good enough job, and I think we will continue needing to do a better and better job.’

But how exactly is Zuckerberg, or anyone else, going to decide what hate speech is? It’s just as subjective as, say, people’s favourite songs. Just as one person’s ‘Stairway to Heaven’ might be another’s ‘Birdie Song’, so one person’s call for controlled migration is another’s idea of a Nuremberg speech.

Maybe you think we should open the borders, or maybe you think we should turn the boats back. The point is, both opinions (and all in between) have exactly the same right to be aired on the streets, on campuses and, yes, even on Facebook.

Believing in free speech means that everyone, whether they are a member of PEGIDA or Unite Against Fascism, should be entitled to express their view. They should also be prepared to be heavily criticised for their opinions. But they should not be silenced because a government, or a tech billionaire, disagrees with them.

In a truly free society there would be no ‘protected groups’ and there would be no bans on ‘hate speech’. Just because you approve of who the iron fist is punching today does not mean you are protected from receiving a ferrous uppercut tomorrow.

Guy Birchall

Anglo Sphere Note:

This just goes to show that Zuck sucks.  Facebook is quickly losing profiles and employees every day.  People are not cool with censorship and especially corporate cooperative censorship.

Facebook stocks fell 4.2% last week.  India banned a Facebook ap that cost FB millions in wasted money to develop and market solely for India.

Facebook is having serious troubles

German Hospitality Intolerable To Refugees, Well F**k Them

Wow, can you believe these ungrateful greedy pigs? Countries like Germany take them in because instead of fighting for their countries and their rights, these losers run like cowards and leave their families behind. But yet they all complain and whine about how things are so tough in another? Hey Abdul, nobody asked you to come.

These losers aren't "refugees", they are a bunch of cowards and free loaders looking for hand outs and a free ride. Get the Hell out and go back to your sad pathetic third world religion dominated country. They didn't ask you to come and they really don't want you there.

Change your attitude, don't complain and bring something to contribute to a free working society and their way of life. Do that and you'll have a better shot making it. But first, fight and fix your country first before you go to a free country.

Hopefully the Western European nations learn something from this, but you know how slow the Leftist learning curve is.

With a one-way ticket home to Iraq in his hands and seven months' worth of frustration over intransigent German bureaucracy in his heart, Gazwan Abdulhasen Abdulla gave up on his dreams of a better life in Europe.

Homesick and eager to be back with his wife and four small children in Basra, Abdulla was giving up his refugee status as he boarded a crowded Iraqi Airways flight from Berlin's Tegel Airport to Baghdad that would whisk him and 150 other disillusioned former refugees back home in five hours.

Full Story at the LA Times, Refugees Return After Finding Germany Intolerable

Black Lives Matters Founder George Soros Nazi Past

Nigel Farage Schools Euro Libturds

Obama Wants Your Kids Under His Control

His Imperial Highness now wants to monitor how you raise your kids.

What White Men Have Done

Today, if one is to believe the constant anti-white, hate-filled and bigoted Establishment propaganda, the white man is the greatest source of evil and unrighteousness in the world. Waves and waves of this propaganda spread the lie that whites are always the victimizers -but never the victim- and have meant nothing but ill towards the "always benevolent races," which have surrounded her lands. As the propagandists teach, Whites -especially those who would preserve their race- are the lowest form of life on earth, to be despised and persecuted, rooted out and exposed as heretics if they do not toe the Multi-Cultural Party line. With their constant encouragement of race-mixing and cover-ups of genuine cases of anti-white genocide throughout history (the Bolshevik revolution, Stalin and the bloody work of his Jewish controllers, deportations and murders of millions of Germans after WWII, etc.), it is quite clear to growing numbers of thinking people that the Establishment seeks the destruction of the White race.

This article is meant to grant them their wish, to suppose that whites had never graced the lands of this planet with their creativity and intelligence. Where would the establishment be? This effort will merely scratch the surface of white creativity. Indeed, it would take hundreds of pages to detail it all. 

Throughout history, no other people have contributed to the betterment of mankind -of all races- than the White race. The "Aryan mind" has been the source of genius, the prime cultivator of technology, and the driving force of progress. Aryans have always been the source of High Culture. 

There is the work of Archimedes, inventor of the lever and pulley; the Archimedean screw, used to lift water for irrigation; the catapult; and the concepts of hydrostatics and buoyancy, among others. Many other ancients have been responsible for the basic inventions that all succeeding generations have drawn upon, from the wheel to basic math and science concepts. Would you throw it all away? The breadth of work by Italian Leonardo da Vinci nearly stuns the mind. His almost workable plans for such revolutionary concepts as the movable bridge, construction crane, a flying machine, the parachute, and other ideas, became realities due to other White contributions to the fulfillment of these ideas. 

Driving a car or other vehicle, on land or water is enjoyed by nearly all. But for the contributions of Germans such as Karl Benz, Gottlieb Daimler, and Wilhelm Maybach to automobile technology, how far would we go? Daimler and Maybach were the first to invent an internal combustion engine light enough to power an automobile; and that they did, though only with three wheels at first. They had perfected a motor bicycle as far back as 1885; a four wheeled car in 1886, and by 1926 had combined with motor vehicle pioneer Karl Benz to form Mercedes-Benz, "Mercedes" being Karl's daughter.

German Rudolf Diesel invented the economic and efficient diesel engine. Men like brothers Charles and Frank Duryea built the first successful gas power automobile on American shores. Vincent Bendix's "Bendix-drive" made hand-cranking an engine obsolete. Henry Ford, the father of mass-production, not to mention white patriot and grand exposer of the Jews, made his Model-T available to the masses and produced the first V-8 engine. Countless others have made critical contributions to modern automotive technology. 

How about the works of other Germans? Rudolf Bunsen invented the gas heater called the Bunsen burner, used in tens of thousands of laboratories and schools, for learning and developing a multitude of ways to benefit our lives. Johannes Gutenberg, as early as the 15th century, developed a movable type mold, first mass-producing the Bible, then other books. The Jewish author of Germany Must Perish surely did not take into account Gutenberg's contribution to the publishing of his vile and vindictive book of genocidal hatred. Elias Howe invented a practical sewing machine in 1846. Karl von Sauerbronn developed the first bicycle as early as 1816. The Siemens brothers pioneered electric railways and lighting, deep-sea telegraph cables, an open-hearth steel-making process, and greatly improved electroplating procedures. These Germans, and many thousands more, have contributed much to your way of life. 

We all enjoy the ready availability of clothing. Would you do without the works of Sir Richard Arkwright, who, as early as 1769, developed a water-powered spinning machine? Edmund Cartwright and Samuel Crompton also made critical advances in weaving technology. Other Whites have also contributed to the development of the textile industry, which we all benefit from. 

Enjoy flying? Would you do without the Whites who invented the airplane, who developed it through its infant stages? The Wright brothers, Samuel Langley, Glenn Curtis, and others began the process. Frenchman Henri Coanda, developed the first airplane to run on a jet propulsion system and, in an entirely different vein of inventive genius, developed a way to convert salt water to freshwater by using the energy of the sun. Multitudes of Whites have contributed to these amazing industries. It would take volumes to detail them all.

How about feeding the masses -not only of our own country- but other nations? Where would we be without John Deere's basic, revolutionary steel plow? Cyrus McCormick invented a reaping machine which is largely credited for the 19th century revolution in agriculture. Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin which helped the South stand on her own two feet. Michael Cudahy developed cold-storage for meat packing, quite a revolutionary and healthy concept. There are many more where those came from. We not only feed many other nations, but give them machinery and teach them so they may one day provide for themselves. Would they have come up with these things on their own? Thousands of years of their bleak history say otherwise.

Whites have also done wonders for the fields of communication. Would you prefer that Samuel Morse had never invented the telegraph, or Morse code; or that Alexander Graham Bell had never invented the telephone? Edwin Howard Armstrong discovered a concept known as frequency modulation. Those of us who are technologically illiterate know this as FM radio. Walter House Brattain, John Bardeen, and William Shockley developed the transistor, and shared a Nobel Prize for it. Italian Guglielmo Marconi invented the wireless telegraph. Lee De Forest improved wireless telegraphy, and revolutionized radio broadcasting with his invention of the triode vacuum tube, an item which is now basic to long distance radio and television communication. Nicholai Tesla also made dramatic improvements in the field of radio communication. 

How about that inventor of inventors; White man extraordinare, Thomas Alva Edison, who - to this day - is unsurpassed in the number of U.S./International Patents issued. He and his White staff invented and improved on many of our staple inventions, such as motion pictures, telephone transmitters, typewriters, electronic generators, the mimeograph machine, and phonograph. He and Tesla invented such modern necessities as the electric light bulb. Enjoy flipping a switch and reading at night? YouÆve got White men to thank. 

Here are just a few of the many other Whites who have contributed to invention. Robert Fulton built the first steam-powered river boat, and helped develop early submarine and canal technology. Enjoy taking and looking at photographs? We have pioneers such as Edwin Land and Belgian-American Leo Hendrick Baekeland to thank. After Englishman Dr. Dunlop's initial discoveries Charles Goodyear perfected the process of vulcanized rubber, thus allowing for longevity of tires. Percy Spencer invented the microwave oven. Nicholai Tesla and Willis Carrier both made critical contributions to the air-conditioning process which makes all of our lives easier today. Many Americans cannot imagine what life would be like without air-conditioning, and they've got White men to thank.

Peter Cooper built the first American steam locomotive, the Tom Thumb. William Burroughs developed the first adding and calculating machines, forerunners of many, many things to come, including the cash-register. Let's not forget those White men who developed early computer technology; like Vannevar Bush, who built the first analog computer in 1930, Blaise Pascal, Charles Babbage, George Boole, and countless others who have contributed to this modern marvel that has touched all our lives. 

What would life be like without all of these inventions? Better? Would any of the above exist? Well, don't be a hypocrite. Throw away all your technology! Go build a lean-to in the woods and try, just try, to live like the primitive cultures. See if you can. Remember what has happened to every nation . . . when Whites have left. What if there were no White people on the face of this world? Would you now destroy the White race?

There are other inventions and inventors, countless others. This paper has only scratched the surface, and has not even made an effort to delve into the enormous White contributions to art and cultural history. White history is indeed glorious, and it is time White children started looking into it.

Peter Anthony